女人の誘惑討論區's Archiver

mnbdacf64 發表於 2013-5-30 17:11

Well-known Logos that Suck Ray Ban Sunglasses Cheap

Famous Logos that Suck
This is a working list of the worst, awful, ugly, and "what the?" of popular corporation logos. It really is wonderful that these suppliers, with their budgets, couldn't come up with anything improved. Some of these logos are listed as a result of aesthetic concerns and other people are right here because of conceptual difficulties. What ever the explanation, you can get massive, popular, and useful brands whose logo does them a disservice.
As stated ahead of, this list is a operate in progress (for the reason that negative design and style never ever goes away) and will hopefully be a useful workout in critical thinking and observation. Participating in vital dialogue, when discussing what could be lacking in our operate, is in general much more important than all the praise which is sometimes heaped upon our perfect work. So in decent exciting, and for educational purposes only, really feel totally free to comment on this list, recommend other horrid logos, or just tell everybody why we're all wrong! The only requirement is always to limit suggestions to logos of well-known or well-liked brands. You can get vast oceans of negative style out there. Sticking with properly identified organizations tends to make it less difficult to discuss,[url=http://raybansale-uk.webs.com/]Ray Ban Wayfarer Size[/url],[url=http://buyabuja.com/ads/fame-cuts-each-approaches-in-major-knife-ray-ban-o/]http://buyabuja.com/ads/fame-cuts-each-approaches-in-major-knife-ray-ban-o/[/url], for the reason that most will have had our personal experiences together with the brands. Let the bashing commence!
This is reported to be the new Miami Dolphins logo. It might be the new logo but is undoubtedly isn't an improvement. The funny thing will be the old logo, when somewhat greater,[url=http://raybans-sale.webs.com/]Ray Ban Aviators[/url], was once regarded as for this list. And what is the deal with Miami and poor design and style? I'm considering adding the Miami Marlins logo here also.
To offer the designer plus the organization credit lets start by saying the format plus the layout of this style isn't negative. It is actually an improvement over the original. Producing the dolphin's curve into a complicated curve definately assists with all the composition plus the flow with the design. Kudos. But immediately after that, there is not a great deal that may be quite good quality.
I think that the weakest part of this logo is conceptual. Previously the design was poor however the viewer nonetheless had the impression that the logo represented a sports team using the inclusion with the helmet. Now, the helmet is gone and so could be the context. Without the need of the sports context the viewer is left to form their very own ideas about who or what the logo represents. And, when this is the case a company is treading around the thin ice of misinterpretation. And, when the helmet is not included I consider the logo looks like a logo for a tropical airline.
American Airlines has been in the news lately for their unveiling of a brand new logo. When I saw it I thought to myself, "What does a slanted blue and red sticker peeling up have to do with flying?" I quickly realized, although I had to produce a mental leap, that the negative space and grey gradient inside the middle was a hugely stylized representation of an eagle,[url=http://92lz.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2752710]http://92lz.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2752710[/url], a hold over from the preceding logo.
Here will be the problem I've using the logo. 1st, the eagle has been so stylized and minimalized that if I wasn't familiar with the firm then I wouldn't possess a clue it was an eagle. There aren't adequate context clues to recognize it as an eagle. Secondly, I get the slant is supposed stick to the angle of an airplane tail fin but again. The designer decreased the recognition of a tail fin by making the vertical sides practically parallel. That is definitely why I believe peeling sticker instead of eagle or airplane.
Lastly,[url=http://raybansla.webs.com/]Ray Ban Sunglasses[/url], I know this does not have to do using the logo itself but in addition to the revamped logo they supplied a mock up of their planes new paint job. This can be exactly where the WT? are available in. What is the garbage around the tail fin? You could would like to go ahead and transform the business name to Miniblind Airlines! Why will be the logo on the fuselage and also a ridiculously stylized flag around the tail? You gave up your largest and most normally viewed branding true estate to a stupid looking flag? You relegated your shiny brand new, while not so superior, logo to just behind the cockpit? The logo design and style is weak as well as the new paint scheme is known as a poorly thought out idea. American Airlines,[url=http://ray-bancheap.webs.com/]Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses[/url], you do know your new logo is not the 1 you paid probably the most for. It truly is that horrid flag in your tail fin.
This logo of Sherwin-Williams has been about since the beginning with the 20th century. It isn't a poor logo as far as the style and aesthetic goes. The problem together with the logo will be the imagery. The connotations of covering the world in paint evokes to a large number of adverse associations. I realize that they may be proud of their heritage but continuing to utilize a logo which has not evolved with society shows a little of insensitivity. This really is related towards the specialist sports logos that depict false or stereotypical photos of Native Americans.
This could be the worst logo as far as pure aesthetic goes. In regards to the only logo criteria it qualifies for is that it is easily recognizable. It really is such a poor design and style. 1st, the shape is terrible for a logo. Its format as a wide flat image will not reproduce at a little scale, similar to online business cards or letterheads. All the detail is lost as quickly as you start shrinking it down. Secondly, the enterprise name is illegible at just about any size. It may well too not have any text at all. Finally, I realize that it is a representation of an automobile grill style but that is certainly specifically the problem. They are generating a logo from a auto part rather of generating a car or truck aspect using the logo on it, like just about every other automaker.
The evolution of the Pepsi logo has gradually turn out to be worse and worse overtime. I fully understand the origin and I can stick to the visual evolution in the logo. That may be until this last revision. I just don't conceptually comply with the progression. The alteration of your white stripe into the current shape eliminates its connection to fluidity or moving liquid. Previously, I could see that naturally occurring motion. It was represented in all of the numerous stages, but now it really is gone. I now get a subtle visual connotation of obesity. The round red physique on the logo appears to have a white belly portruding from underneath. To me,[url=http://www.hbjmyh.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=39165]http://www.hbjmyh.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=39165[/url], this appears a little careless and I know it wasn't intended but it is what the customer can picture. And, all of us know what a customer thinks is deeply correlated to what a consumer buys.
The Brooklyn Nets logo is not terrible as far as organization, balance, clarity, and scalability. The problem with this logo is that all of the elements look bland, poorly chosen, and amatuerly place together. It appears like a collection of clip art which could be located on any laptop that has Microsoft Word. I think in a basic aethestetic, but excellent has to be present inside the simplicity. I get the impression that conceptually there was tiny believed put into this design. There may have been ardous hours wanting to establish what logo to utilize however the basically designing of this logo looks like it took ten minutes. None of your clean, very simple, and minimalist feel seems purposeful. I can not visually establish if it was intentional or not, and which is a characteristic of poor design operate. I really like minimalist logos, I think they are the most helpful. (See my lens on Paul Rand) but this logo will not pull of minimal especially effectively. I believe that perhaps the idea was to design a logo using a classic or vintage really feel but you'll find no vintage attributes. Somebody mistook effortless for vintage.

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.